Add new comment
Submitted by kylector (not verified) on Tue, 2004-11-02 20:55.
While not as extreme as yesterdays, it still begs the question, why? Why call a replace function on a hard-coded string?? The only explanation I think of is that the literal string used to be a variable and when it became a literal, the person that made the code change didn't strip out the function. Perhaps it was the victim of a global search & replace?